Comments on: .andSelf() http://api.jquery.com/andSelf/ jQuery API Reference Fri, 19 Aug 2011 09:06:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Guest http://api.jquery.com/andSelf/comment-page-1/#comment-8666 Guest Thu, 27 Jan 2011 18:58:38 +0000 http://api.jquery.com/?p=335#comment-8666 Can't get it :( Can't get it :(

]]> By: John Reeves http://api.jquery.com/andSelf/comment-page-1/#comment-8016 John Reeves Tue, 12 Oct 2010 22:18:16 +0000 http://api.jquery.com/?p=335#comment-8016 Maybe because I have the same question, I can understand what he meant. <br><br>What is the effect of $something.andSelf().andSelf()<br><br>His A and B refer to the stack of jQuery result sets. In the first example, he did a query that resulted in A, then one based on that which resulted in B, then he did andSelf(), which resulted in A+B being on the stack. The other examples explain themselves.<br><br>I just did a little test which showed that andSelf() actually pushes the current result set on the stack, which is not very useful. So the answer is andSelf causes the first example, "A, B, A+B". andSelf().andSelf() causes "A, B, A+B, A+B" Maybe because I have the same question, I can understand what he meant.

What is the effect of $something.andSelf().andSelf()

His A and B refer to the stack of jQuery result sets. In the first example, he did a query that resulted in A, then one based on that which resulted in B, then he did andSelf(), which resulted in A+B being on the stack. The other examples explain themselves.

I just did a little test which showed that andSelf() actually pushes the current result set on the stack, which is not very useful. So the answer is andSelf causes the first example, “A, B, A+B”. andSelf().andSelf() causes “A, B, A+B, A+B”

]]> By: John Reeves http://api.jquery.com/andSelf/comment-page-1/#comment-6299 John Reeves Tue, 12 Oct 2010 14:18:16 +0000 http://api.jquery.com/?p=335#comment-6299 Maybe because I have the same question, I can understand what he meant. <br><br>What is the effect of $something.andSelf().andSelf()<br><br>His A and B refer to the stack of jQuery result sets. In the first example, he did a query that resulted in A, then one based on that which resulted in B, then he did andSelf(), which resulted in A+B being on the stack. The other examples explain themselves.<br><br>I just did a little test which showed that andSelf() actually pushes the current result set on the stack, which is not very useful. So the answer is andSelf causes the first example, "A, B, A+B". andSelf().andSelf() causes "A, B, A+B, A+B" Maybe because I have the same question, I can understand what he meant.

What is the effect of $something.andSelf().andSelf()

His A and B refer to the stack of jQuery result sets. In the first example, he did a query that resulted in A, then one based on that which resulted in B, then he did andSelf(), which resulted in A+B being on the stack. The other examples explain themselves.

I just did a little test which showed that andSelf() actually pushes the current result set on the stack, which is not very useful. So the answer is andSelf causes the first example, “A, B, A+B”. andSelf().andSelf() causes “A, B, A+B, A+B”

]]> By: Karl Swedberg http://api.jquery.com/andSelf/comment-page-1/#comment-5973 Karl Swedberg Sun, 26 Sep 2010 15:36:47 +0000 http://api.jquery.com/?p=335#comment-5973 It keeps the resulting elements in the order in which they appear in the document. It keeps the resulting elements in the order in which they appear in the document.

]]> By: Karl Swedberg http://api.jquery.com/andSelf/comment-page-1/#comment-5972 Karl Swedberg Sun, 26 Sep 2010 15:35:47 +0000 http://api.jquery.com/?p=335#comment-5972 Not sure what your A and B are referring to, but the last paragraph before the Example above states that the elements are returned in the order in which they appear in the document. Each element appears in the resulting set only once, so if you did $('li').filter(':first').andSelf(), the first list item would still appear once in the set, followed by the other list items. Not sure what your A and B are referring to, but the last paragraph before the Example above states that the elements are returned in the order in which they appear in the document. Each element appears in the resulting set only once, so if you did $('li').filter(':first').andSelf(), the first list item would still appear once in the set, followed by the other list items.

]]> By: Bob kerns http://api.jquery.com/andSelf/comment-page-1/#comment-5407 Bob kerns Mon, 06 Sep 2010 16:20:10 +0000 http://api.jquery.com/?p=335#comment-5407 The documentation fails to state the effect of andSelf() on the stack!<br><br>Yes, it merges. But that leaves us three possible stack outcomes.<br><br>A, B, A+B<br>A, A+B<br>A+B<br><br>Which case is it? The documentation should state.<br> The documentation fails to state the effect of andSelf() on the stack!

Yes, it merges. But that leaves us three possible stack outcomes.

A, B, A+B
A, A+B
A+B

Which case is it? The documentation should state.

]]> By: Mkaestner http://api.jquery.com/andSelf/comment-page-1/#comment-5367 Mkaestner Thu, 15 Jul 2010 13:47:15 +0000 http://api.jquery.com/?p=335#comment-5367 As I see it is appended. Which is for me a problem. As I see it is appended. Which is for me a problem.

]]> By: Scott Buchanan http://api.jquery.com/andSelf/comment-page-1/#comment-5366 Scott Buchanan Wed, 23 Jun 2010 12:37:38 +0000 http://api.jquery.com/?p=335#comment-5366 This would be very helpful. It would also improve performance when you need to do this, as the filter would not be run twice on the elements returned from find(). This would be very helpful. It would also improve performance when you need to do this, as the filter would not be run twice on the elements returned from find().

]]> By: Nick Craver http://api.jquery.com/andSelf/comment-page-1/#comment-11244 Nick Craver Thu, 13 May 2010 15:41:00 +0000 http://api.jquery.com/?p=335#comment-11244 What are the chances of giving this the ability to take a selector? When any descendant or current elements that match the current selector, there's not a quick way to do this, currently it's .find(selector).andSelf().filter(selector) or some combination, would be nice if .andSelf() was able to take a selector already, doing the filter internally. What are the chances of giving this the ability to take a selector? When any descendant or current elements that match the current selector, there’s not a quick way to do this, currently it’s .find(selector).andSelf().filter(selector) or some combination, would be nice if .andSelf() was able to take a selector already, doing the filter internally.

]]> By: Eamon Nerbonne http://api.jquery.com/andSelf/comment-page-1/#comment-2766 Eamon Nerbonne Sat, 01 May 2010 04:53:59 +0000 http://api.jquery.com/?p=335#comment-2766 Does andSelf add the previous set before or after the current set? Does andSelf add the previous set before or after the current set?

]]>